<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Does the NC20 Use the Via Nano Processor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor</link>
	<description>All About the Samsung NC20 Netbook. Totally Independent!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:55:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samsung NC20 UK Launch - It&#8217;s Official &#124; Samsung NC20</title>
		<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung NC20 UK Launch - It&#8217;s Official &#124; Samsung NC20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsungnc20.com/?p=79#comment-567</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Nano 1.3GHz processor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Nano 1.3GHz processor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsungnc20.com/?p=79#comment-56</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Via Nano doesn’t need to work as hard to generate the same results. Tweaktown ran a test using a standard MPEG4 video. Their Intel Atom test system ran at 61% CPU usage to play the video. Their VIA Nano test system ran at just 23% CPU usage. &quot;

Thats such an unfair comparison as the VIA Nano motherboard chipset has onboard support for video acceleration so the CPU is bound to be doing less work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Via Nano doesn’t need to work as hard to generate the same results. Tweaktown ran a test using a standard MPEG4 video. Their Intel Atom test system ran at 61% CPU usage to play the video. Their VIA Nano test system ran at just 23% CPU usage. &#8221;</p>
<p>Thats such an unfair comparison as the VIA Nano motherboard chipset has onboard support for video acceleration so the CPU is bound to be doing less work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 200,000 Samsung NC 20 laptops at launch. &#124; Samsung NC20</title>
		<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>200,000 Samsung NC 20 laptops at launch. &#124; Samsung NC20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsungnc20.com/?p=79#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] We have also done our own comparison against the two processors, which you can find here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have also done our own comparison against the two processors, which you can find here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez - Samsung NC20 Community</title>
		<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez - Samsung NC20 Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsungnc20.com/?p=79#comment-18</guid>
		<description>And interestingly, if the rumour of Dell droping their twelve incher is true, Samsung might well be the only buying option for anyone who wants one.  But to be honest I&#039;m not sure the majority of consumers will be too aware of the different chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And interestingly, if the rumour of Dell droping their twelve incher is true, Samsung might well be the only buying option for anyone who wants one.  But to be honest I&#8217;m not sure the majority of consumers will be too aware of the different chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.samsungnc20.com/why-does-the-nc20-use-the-via-nano-processor/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsungnc20.com/?p=79#comment-16</guid>
		<description>It seems to me from other sites (eg tech crunch http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/06/here-come-the-12-inch-netbooks-and-intel-isnt-happy-about-it/) plus the fact that Dell sells a 12-inch Atom-based mini in the US that the Atom is capable of supporting a 12&quot; screen (or any size for that matter) but is afraid that it may have made a cheap chip that will displace its own higher-profiting dual-core racket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me from other sites (eg tech crunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/06/here-come-the-12-inch-netbooks-and-intel-isnt-happy-about-it/)" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.techcrunch.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/06/here-come-the-12-inch-netbooks-and-intel-isnt-happy-about-it/)</a> plus the fact that Dell sells a 12-inch Atom-based mini in the US that the Atom is capable of supporting a 12&#8243; screen (or any size for that matter) but is afraid that it may have made a cheap chip that will displace its own higher-profiting dual-core racket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
